Archive for the ‘war and peace’ Category

Tunisia: another Arab Spring turns into a Winter of Discontent

May 22, 2013

Since the 2011 revolution, Tunisia has been consumed by a struggle between liberals and the moderate majority Nahda Islamist party as the country moves to finalize a new constitution and prepare for elections. But, as in other Arab states in transition, dealing with the more radical Islamists, the puritanical Salafis, poses the biggest challenge to any form of democracy.

Tunisia’s secularists view a strict, austere Islam as alien to the country’s relatively open and moderate culture, as well as devastating towards the wealth-creating tourist industry. But the Salafis deploy much-needed social welfare programs to attract young Tunisians for whom Nahda is insufficiently Islamist and insufficiently successful in terms of job-creation.

Tunisia has become a fertile environment for radical fundamentalism. Weapons from the poorly-handled revolution in Libya have found their way to Tunisia and jihadi fighters have holed up in a region on the border with Algeria. Moreover, the civil war in Syria has attracted recruits from north Africa, including many Tunisians. Hardened jihadists eventually return to their homeland and turn their guns onto their own governments. Tunisia could easily become yet another welcoming watering hole for al-qaeda terrorists.

All this was entirely predictable when the Arab Spring began. Foolish Western governments that ignored trusted allies and fostered revolutions that brought them down, will suffer long-term for such short-sighted betrayals.

Hat Tip: ‘War within Islam’, Financial Times, May 22, 2013

Obama ignores nuclear threat from North Korea

May 21, 2013

Since 2006, North Korea has conducted at least three apparently successful nuclear tests. It has also orbited a satellite. Together, these events fulfill the basic technological requirements for an intercontinental ballistic missile that can deliver a nuclear warhead against mainland United States.

Miniaturizing a warhead to fit on a missile is not an overwhelming technical obstacle. North Korea requires only one ICBM capable of delivering a single nuclear warhead in order to pose an existential threat to the United States.The Electromagnetic Pulse Commission, the Congressional Strategic Posture Commission, together with several other U.S. studies have established that detonating a nuclear weapon high above any part of the U.S. mainland would generate a catastrophic electro-magnetic pulse.

Sucn an EMP attack would collapse the electric grid and other infrastructure that depends upon it. 300 million Americans would be placed in immediate and serious life-threatening jeopardy. An EMP attack would plunge the U.S. electricity-powered civilization into a black-out potentially lasting for several years. The U.S. currently has no missile defense assets devoted to stopping a missile coming from the south. All such assets currently are positioned to intercept a missile strike in the middle or late part of its trajectory coming from the north polar region. The Obama administration indeed has cancelled the only two U.S. boost-phase or space-based defensive systems.

Wake up President Obama while sufficiwnt electricity remains for you to smell the coffee.A surgical strike to prevent North Korean development of an ICBM has never been more urgent.

Hat Tip: R.James Woolsey and Peter Vincent fry, ‘How North Korea Could Cripple the U.S.’, The Wall Street Journal, May 21, 2013

Obama White House is corrupted by Chicago machine-politics

May 11, 2013

Just about any one who has followed this week’s discussion of the Benghazi terrorist attack knows that President Obama, Secretary of State Clinton and U.N. Ambassador Rice repeatedly lied about the nature of the event and why American government officials were not protected by F-16s and SAS forces.

A not-uncommon response to the sequence of lies exposed by Gregory Hicks, Mark Thompson and Eric Nordstrom before the House oversight committee this week is ‘who cares?’ The dead are long buried, other events now dominate public discussion, and come 2016, Hillary Clinton will be on her way to the White House. The victors get to write the history.

Now all this may be true. It is an old adage that a democracy gets the government it deserves. And the present government is showing itself to be about as despicable as one could ever imagine. So that pretty much sums up the moral and intellectual caliber of the electoral majority that currently controls the United States political market-place.

However, I beg to differ with this dismissive view of Benghazi. What Benghazi told a watching world is that the President and the Secretary of State of the United States both care more for their political prospects than for the honor of their country. Both are prepared to lie, not just to the world at large, but to the families of the fallen, about the reason for their murders and the retribution that will be exacted. For an al Qaeda attack on U.S. property and personnel, a crackpot California video-maker will be wrongly jailed. Some honor regained, some retribution extracted!

“From the day of the attack until this week, the White House spin was too clever by half. In the weeks and months after the attack White House spokesmen said they were investigating the story, an internal review was under way. When the story blew open again, last week, they saiud it was too far in the past: ‘Benghazi happened a long time ago’, Jay Carney, The White House press secretary, really said that. Think of that. They can’t give answers when the story’s fresh because it just happened, they’re looking into it. Eight months later they don’t have anything to say because it all happened so long ago. Think of how low your opinion of the American people has to be to think you can get away, forever, with that.” Peggy Noonan, ‘The Inconvenient Truth About Benghazi’, The Wall Street Journal, May 11, 2013

Well, not the entire American people. Just those who sheepishly voted a Chicago-machine politician back into office in the teeth of one of the worst first-term records in the history of the Republic. These voters truly got what they expected and what they deserved. Their children and their grandchildren may well live to despise them for their failure of good judgment if, that is, they are not wiped out by a nuclear terrorist attack on their undefended homeland.

Obama-Clinton BS on Benghazi

May 9, 2013

In pursuit of two presidential victories – Barack Obama in 2012 and Hillary Rodham Clinton in 2016 – President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton manipulated their puppet-on-a-string, Susan Rice to spread a false message to the American public following the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack on the US diplomatic mission in Benghazi.

U.N. Ambassador Rice blanketed the Sunday talk shows to deny that a terrorist attack had occurred. Rather, what happened on September 11, she span, was a spontaneous protest in response to a video insulting Islam. Well, there are lies, damned lies and Benghazi lies, and there can be few superiors to Susan Rice in the relaying of White House and State Department whoppers. Susan Rice looks like a witch, walks like a witch and sounds like a witch. Pretty much, that identifies her as an apparition that would not relish a bucketful of water.

At yesterday’s hearing before the House oversight committee, three witnesses – Gregory Hicks, Mark Thompson and Eric Nordstrom – corrected the lies that emanated from the twisted lips of Witch Rice. Gregory Hicks, the former deputy chief of mission at the embassy in Tripoli recalled his last conversation with Ambassador Christopher Stevens who told him: ‘Greg, we’re under attack’. At that moment Mr. Hicks knew that Islamic terrorists were behind the assault. Mr Hicks personally briefed Hillary Clinton that night on the nature of the attack. Yet Clinton advised the father of Tyrone Woods much later that the YouTube video maker ‘would be prosecuted and arrested’. Trustworthy couple, those Clintons over matters appertaining to their political futures.

After Stevens and an aide were killed at the mission, the terrorists turned on the CIA annex nearby. On the advice of the military attache in Tripoli, Mr. Hicks asked for U.S. fighter planes to fly over the complex in an attempt to scare the attackers away. He was advised that no fighter planes were available. Early the following morning, two Americans died in a mortar attack on the CIA compound.

The Pentagon says that no F-16s were on call that night. Why not? Had Hillary Clinton gone to bed without requesting them? Was she asleep in bed instead of on alert for that crucial 3 am call?

The saddest part of yesterday’s hearing was the warning that had to be repeatedly administered by Republican members of the oversight committee against any attempt by the administration to seek career-damaging revenge against the three brave whistle-blowers who exposed the lies of Obama, Clinton and Rice on the eve of the 2012 elections. What kind of country is the U.S. when such warnings are required? And what kind of country is it when Democratic Party members worked not to reveal the truth but rather to protect Obama and Clinton from the cleansing power of the truth?

Hat Tip: Elliott Abrams, ‘Benghazi Truths vs. Washington Politics’, The Wall Street Journal, May 9, 2013

The Chinese Dream of Premier Xi Jinping

May 7, 2013

During his first weeks in power, Xi Jinping, the new head of the ruling Communist Party, has promoted a slogan designed to unite an increasingly diverse nation: The Chinese Dream. News bulletins across the nation are full of his dream, evoking its American equivalent. A talent show on television is looking for ‘The Voice of the Chinese Dream’.

Unfortunately,Xi Jinping’s dream falls somewhat short of the aspirations outlined so eloquently by Thomas Jefferson in The Declaration of Independence and by James Madison in the Constitution of the United States. It does indeed encompass the pursuit of happiness: ‘To meet our people’s desire for a happy life is our mission.’ Unfortunately, it falls well short of any desire to promote individualism, and especially to advance the liberty of each individual from the reach of the Communist Party.

Instead, Xi Jinping’s dream incorporates a troubling whiff of nationalism and of a repackaged form of authoritarianism. It is no coincidence that Mr. Xi’s first mention of his dream of ‘the great revival of the Chinese nation’ came in November 2012 in a speech at the national museum in Tiananmen Square, where an exhibition called ‘Road to Revival’ lays out China’s past suffering at the hands of colonial powers and its rescue by the Communist Party.

In bowing towards a renewed nationalism, Xi Jinping is already courting China’s armed forces. In December 2012, on an inspection tour of the navy in southern China, he spoke reverently of a ‘strong army dream’. Suggestively, he told the generals that the spirit of a strong army lies in resolutely obeying the orders ofd the Communist Party. The Chinese dreams, he stated is an ideal. Communists should have a higher ideal, and that is Communism.

Of one thing, one can be absolutely certain. Xi Jinping’s dream falls well short of any notion of the rule of law. The rule of law can only come to China when dictatorship collapses. And Xi Jinping’s dream does not carry with it any notion whatsoever of a martyr’s death.

Hat Tip: ‘Xi Jinping and the Chinese Dream’, The EconomistMay 4, 2011

Cyprus should reunite

May 5, 2013

Greek Cypriots confront a grim economic future following banking collapse and bail-out by the euro-zone. Gross domestic product will decline by 15 per cent in 2013, by another 15 per cent in 2014 and perhaps by another 5 per cent in 2015..That is comparable to the decline over 1974-1975 following a failed Greek-led coup followed by a successful Turkish invasion and a Turkish-Cypriot-controlled north.

It will take many years for Greek-Cyprus to return to its pre-crisis level of gross domestic product. A more vibrant north currently rivals the lowered living standards of the south.

The island as a unified whole, however, would enjoy two promising sources of growth. One is the recently discovered Aphrodite gas field in the Easfrern Mediterranean. The other is tourism, an underdeveloped industry with plenty of scope for foreign investment.

Without reunification, both sources of wealth are unlikely to be tapped Both governments lay claim to the gasfield while the cheapest route for exporting the gas would through Turkey. Tourists shy away from unstable regions.

Whether Cypriots will respond to strong economic signals is far from certain. Cyprus, it is said, never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity. However the combination of a Greek-Cypriot meltdown and the Aprhrodite gasfield may just suffice to return the crazy Cypriot people to to a modicum of rationality. Sometimes even irrational peoples recognize win-win situations.

President Obama vanishes into the ether of ego

May 2, 2013

“At the president’s news conference Tuesday, when a reporter wondered whether setbacks on gun control and the sequester suggested Mr. Obama was having problems pushing his second-term agenda, the president replied, ‘Well if you put it that way, Jonathan, maybe I should pack up and go home.’ Whoa, big fella. The presidency is a big game. We want you suited up and on the floor.’” Daniel Henninger, ‘Presidential Followership’, The Wall Street Journal, May 2, 2013

That the presidency attracts individuals focused on Number One is no revelation. That the focus sometimes reaches the psychological condition of narcissism, when a president actually lacks self-love, because of a disrupted childhood, and seeks compensatory adoration from campaign followers, is also not unknown. President Obama suffers from an excessive focus on Number One and a chronic form of narcissism. With 40 months in office remaining, this is a dangerous situation for the United States.

It is dangerous because such a leader essentially becomes a follower of any group of adoring citizens, concerned never to breach their love by an act of statesmanship. Standing essentially aloof from the major branch of government – the Congress – unable to lower his self-esteem by negotiating deals that are helpful to the public at large, Obama is trapped by his followers into a followership mode of governance. That is why he is essentially impotent on gun control laws, on fiscal policy, on Syria, and on Middle East policy.

“Whether Roosevelt, Nixon, Bill Clinton or George W Bush, every second-term president must in time come to grips with the reality that it can’t be about just him. It, the presidency, is unavoidably about offering clear leadership for all the American people and a watching, always unsettled world. If Barack Obama insists it’s about something else, everyone, including him, will have their bags packed for a long 40 months.” ibid.

One more day, one more Obama wobble

May 1, 2013

In 2008, Barack Obama campaigned to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, a facility that he claimed was assisting the recruitment of terrorists. To that end he appointed the worst Attorney General ever in the United States, Eric Holder, purely because he also was a Bush-hater and a man who had no understanding of the nature of terrorism.

Early on during his first term, Obama discovered that George W Bush had a great deal more wisdom than he had imagined.Those prisoners held in Cuba were truly the scum of the earth. Almost every single prisoner released from that prison went straight back into anti-U.S. terrorism. Obama abandoned his campaign promise early in his first term after resistance from both political parties in the Congress. Eric Holder smoldered with anger at this retreat, but continued to serve in his lucrative and powerful office.

In his 2012 re-election campaign, Guantanamo Bay was well off the Obama agenda. Now he is wobbling once again, in response to a hunger strike adopted by some 100 of the remaining 166 prisoners. Apparently, Obama is deeply disturbed because 25 of those hunger strikers are being force-fed.

Given who and what those prisoners are, Obama should be rejoicing in the hunger strike and advising prison officials to to leave food and water in their cells, but otherwise let them do what they will. If 100 prisoners starve themselves to death, everyone is better off – the prisoners who hope to reach Paradise, the taxpayers who pay hard-earned money to keep them in prolonged captivity, and the civilized world that does not have to protect itself from their evil.

Obama is out of ideas and out of energy. So he looks for a fight with Congress on a truly wobbly agenda that he will not win

Syria violates Obama red-line, without observable Obama response

April 26, 2013

Weak individuals should never lay down red-lines that define harsh consequences for stronger men who cross such lines. Barack Obama – surely the weakest and most cowardly U.S. president in the history of the Republic – drew just such a red-line for Syria in August 2012, when he threatened U.S. military action against the Assad regime were it to deploy chemical or biological weapons against its own people.

U.S. intelligence agencies – belatedly responding to determinations by British, French and Israeli intelligence – now believe, from soil analysis, that the embattled regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons in the form of Sarin gas on March 9, 2013 in the town of Khan al-Asai on the outskirts of the northern city of Aleppo, and subsequently on at least three other occasions. Syrian rebels claim that the regime first used such a weapon in the central city of Homs in December 2012, and in the Damascus suburbs also in March 2013.

The Obama response to such evidence is typical of the response of any coward confronted by a bully willing to test his resolve. ‘The amounts used are small’, he weakly bleats. ‘The evidence is not 100 per cent’ he mumbles, crawling into his Pennsylvania Avenue funk hole. More courageous souls, who have actually served their country on the front line, offer a significantly different response:

“The president of the United States said that if Mr. Assad used chemical weapons, it would be a game changer – that is it would cross a red line – and it’s pretty obvious that red line has been crossed’ Mr. McCain said.

But then Senator McCain denied his Asian enemy captors any information for several long years in captivity, despite exposure to excruciating torture. How long do you think that Barack Obama would hold out in similar circumstances before spilling the beans?

President and Attorney General subvert FBI interrogation of Chechen terrorist

April 25, 2013

The Obama administration was provided with two alternative routes to grilling the Boston Marathon terrorist, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, without reading him his Miranda rights. The first route, rejected outright by Barack Obama and Eric Holder, was to treat the suspect as an enemy combatant and to interrogate him and try him by military tribunal. The second route was to rely on the public safety exception clause to allow the FBI to interrogate him for up to 48 hours prior to issuing a Miranda warning.

The FBI secured the hospital ward and began its interrogation of Tsarnaev with spectacular early results during the first 16 hours. No doubt panicking lest the FBI completely wrapped up the case, and identified a wider network of U.S. Islamic cells, Obama and Holder then authorized a federal magistrate to pierce the FBI shield and to issue the Miranda warning after only 16 hours of interrogation.

Not surprisingly, the suspect immediately clammed up, and the opportunity evaporated. Such a political intervention can be explained only in terms of extreme incompetence on the part of President and Attorney General or in terms of their covert desire to protect Islamic terrorist cells within the United States from exposure and eradication.

Take your pick!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 68 other followers