James Madison on how Obama populism should be checked

“The inference to which we are brought is, that the causesof faction cannot be removed, and that the relief is only to be sought in the means of controlling its effects. If a faction consists of less than a majority, relief is supplied by the republican principle, which enables the majority to defeat its sinister views by regular vote. It may clog the administration, it may convulse the society; but it will be unable to execute and mask its violence under the forms of the Constitution. When a majority is included in a faction, the form of popular government, on the other hand, enables it to sacrifice to its ruling passion or interests both the public good and private rights against the danger of such a faction, and at the same time to preserve the spirit and the form of popular government, is then the great object to which our inquiries are directed….By what means is this object attainable? Evidently by one of two only. Either the existence of the same passion or interest in a majority at the same time must be prevented, or the majority, having such coexistent passion or interest, must be rendered, by their number and local situation, unable to concert and carry into effect schemes of oppression.” James Madison, The Federalist No. 10

The Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution to protect Americans from the tyranny of majorities as well as minorities. The separation of powers is key to that protection. That is why Americans should not castigate the majority in the House of Representatives for defending minorities against Obama populism. Each member of that House takes an oath to preserve and protect the Constitution. Restraining the passion of some transient majority when it attempts to invade the individual liberties of known minorities is the fulcrum of the republican ideal of government. The House of Representatives failed in that duty when dealing with the first stage of the fiscal cliff. Let us hope that it will not fail again.

Tags: , , , ,

4 Responses to “James Madison on how Obama populism should be checked”

  1. A6 Says:

    Up to a point, what Obama and the Crazy 111th did was just what presidents and congresses do. The reason they used to do it less to the United States was (alas) not because our people is so virtuous, although it used to me more so than it now is; but because the courts, following our constitution, protected us. It to the progressives (then liberals, then again progressives) over a hundred years to demolish it.

    It was great while it lasted.

  2. charlesrowley Says:

    The progressives pretty much have now succeeded in their aim

  3. A6 Says:

    Yes, I fear so. It is now decided that the Congress can do anything whatever, even though it cannot quite do anything whatever *under the Commerce Power*.

    (… barring specific exceptions in the Bill of Rights.)

    I surmise C.J. Roberts thinks all that “government of limited and enumerated powers” stuff was just … persiflage.

  4. bermuda grass seed Says:

    This excellent website truly has all of the information and facts I needed concerning this subject and didn’t know who to ask.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 77 other followers

%d bloggers like this: