With officials from both Israel and the U.S. calling a nuclear-armed Iran a red line, leaving the possibility of a military option on the table, we must realize that the only possible solution to this dilemma is a regime change in Iran, which a majority of the Iranians support. The price we pay today to save world peace and security will be miniscule to what the world will pay in the not-so-distant future.” Reze Kahilli*, ‘The coming war with Iran’, The Washington Times, December 30, 2011
President George W Bush correctly identified Iran several years ago as part of the Axis of Evil against which the West must be prepared proactively to defend itself. Throughout the first three years of the Obama adminisistration, reflexive weakness towards Islam has allowed Iranian evil to fester and infect other Shiite Muslims across the Middle East. The danger is now more imminent as the Mad Mullahs reach out for nuclear weapons capable of wreaking havoc across the globe.
Of course a nuclear attack by Iran, on any nation, whether directly or through proxies, would attract immediate nuclear devastation for its entire population as the U.S. responded rightly and overwelmingly with the ultimate sanction. But that is a high price to pay for irresponsible appeasement now. Retaliation threats cannot be relied on when dealing with the clinically insane. So surgical removal of the Iranian regime is the only rational alternative.
About 40 per cent of the world’s oil, and the majority of all oil exports by eight countries in the Persian Gulf, pass through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway that could potentially be blocked by Iranian military intervention. The recent threat by the Mullahs to to close that waterway down is sufficient cause for the U.S., together with a coalition of the willing, to shut down the Iranian regime.
Air intervention should be the preferred mechanism, targeting Tehran and key military and nuclear installations with missiles designed to take down the country’s infrastructure and to destroy the Revolutionary Guards and all their accolites. The aim should be to disturb, destroy, and exit, leaving a potentially free Iranian people to rise up against the monsters who have enslaved them, but who would then be relatively disarmed.
No nation-building should be on the table. That is the responsibility of the Iranian people, and the Iranian people alone. No U.S. boots on the ground. Just lots and lots of U.S. missiles pouring down on the Mullahs from all directions until, like the Japanese in 1945, they beg for unconditional terms of surrender.
* Reza Kahilli is the pseudonym for a former CIA operative in Iran’s Revolutionary Guards who now teaches at the U.S Department of Defense’s Joint Counterintelligence Training Academy.
Tags: case for regime removal, no nation building, nuclear threat to world peace, Revolutionary Guards, Strait of Hormuz, surgical air strikes, threat to oil shipments
December 30, 2011 at 4:18 pm |
You probably know that Iran and North Korea are the only two countries in the world that do not have western central banks (CB). In order to install such banks, regime change will not be sufficient. Total occupation and chaos for a temporary period, will be necessary. The US and the Israel are beating the war drums against the two countries just for the control of their people, resources, and money.
The war in Afghanistan started on October 7, 2001. In the middle of this war the central bank planned a meeting in Bonn, Germany, started printing new currency, and by Jan 2, 2002 replaced all old Afghan currencies. The PBS news reporter Margaret Warner asked the advisor to the new central bank in Afghanistan why it was so important to change the currency at this critical war time.
The Iraq war started on March 20, 2003. By January 15, 2004 all Iraqi currencies were replaced by new currency and the central bank was installed on March 6, 2004. In the middle of Iraq war, the west has installed the central bank, without even telling the people what they are doing. Nobody in the government of Iraq, which was not even there, realized what happened to their money and power of their people.
Now we know why we went to war against the Muslim countries. There are at least 10 books on the conspiracy theory of 9-11. And probably one million people have read them by now and believe in it too. It is quite possible that 9-11 was engineered to create war to install CB in Iraq and Afghanistan.
January 3, 2012 at 7:51 am |
What utter nonsense. You have shown that you know nothing about the history of Islam, or that those who seek to impose the Ummah on the whole of the world are at fault.
There was no conspiracy regarding the events on September 11. It was exactly as it has always been stated – Osama Bin Laden and his minions masterminded the attack. This attack was a follow up from the first attack on the World Trade Centre.