“Until recently, the rich world was see-sawing between stagflation and inflation. When the crisis was at its worst, output took a nosedive but it was deflation, not inflation, that was the greatest concern. Then economies recovered, as did assets – including commodities, whose prices have pushed inflation out of policymakers’ comfort zone. Now both sides of the dreaded 1970s portmanteau threaten to come together as production slows down while prices continue apace. Stagflation has gone from unpleasant memory to present danger.” ‘Editorial, ‘Haunted by stagflation fears’, The Financial Times, April 30, 2011
The evidence acknowledged by the FT editor is fairly compelling. In the United Kingdom, first-quarter growth in 2011 at only 2 per cent per annum, followed on a fourth quarter 2010 contraction, while inflation ran at an annualised rate of some 5 per cent. In the United States, first quarter 2011 growth ran at an annualized rate of only 1.8 per cent, slowing from a 3.1 per cent annualized rate in the fourth quarter of 2010, while inflation, inclusive of commodity prices, exceeded the Fed’s 2 per cent ceiling.
The FT, relying on hydraulic Keynesian thinking, draws sustenance from the fact that both the UK and the US economies are running below full capacity, arguing that loose money is less likely now than in the 1970s to fuel runaway inflation. It forgets, conveniently, that 1970s inflation occurred against high and rising unemployment rates in both countries. ‘Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon” (Milton Friedman).
The FT, forgetful as always of recent history, draws further sustenance from the fact that rising commodity prices are driven more by micro-economic forces of demand and supply than by loose money, by Middle East shocks rather than by Bad Ben Bernanke. Do the years 1974 and 1079 not ring any bells in FT ears? The fact is that economic shocks ripple through any economy. In an environment of loose money, price inflation is the mechanism whereby market equilibria return. That is what stagflation was all about during the 1970s and what stagflation will be all about in the coming decade.
This gives hope that if the rich world suffers a mild case of stagflation, it is a temporary symptom of inevitable economic shifts.” ibid.
I am afraid that such is not the case, Mr. FT editor. Stagflation is a response to loose money and it will be brought to an end, only painfully and with long and variable lags, by a systematic tightening of monetary policy, designed to raise real interest rates to market-clearing levels. Once inflation-expectations are released from their cage, it is the Devil’s own work to put them back in, as Paul Volcker will readily testify. Unfortunately for the world’s economy, Ben Bernanke is no Paul Volcker, though he may stand at the left hand side of Satan.
Tags: Ben Bermanke is no Paul Volcker, loose money is the cause, stagflation returns to the UK and the US, tight money is the solution
May 3, 2011 at 6:29 am |
This sounds like the same phenomena that is present in Australia. I just noted a headline that said the Reserve Bank is not increasing interest rates this month.
However, as I had already noted to you, the other signs that the FT has not acknowledged seem to be present.
The sequence seems to be: high spending, cost-push inflation, higher interest rates, coupled with the oil shocks.
Historically, in Australia, this was seen with the last McMahon government budget where there was a mild increase in government expenditure, followed by very high increases in government spending when Whitlam and his cronies won government in December 1972. As a result of that expenditure we had an out of control budget deficit that took many years to bring back into balance, as well as high unemployment (that also killed professional jobs), and high interest rates. This led to the prolongation of the stagflation into the 1980s.
The signs that we have now are based upon similar criteria: high interest rates (although they do seem low), high unemployment and inflation above what is desirable which is the current situation in Australia. At least with the Reserve Bank not increasing the interest rates it means that we have a little bit of reprieve. However, there are some other factors to consider this time around.
At least here in Australia the new factors relate to some new taxes being borne by the community: the threatened introduction of the unnecessary and damaging carbon tax, plus the flood relief tax (because Qld did not have insurance to cover such a contingency). On top of that there has been wasteful government spending on such things as the schools building program, the insulation debacle as well as expenditure on the great solar panel rip off, plus expenditure on the white elephant NBN net work. In a few short years a budget surplus became a budget deficit. Thus the Rudd-Gillard government has managed to recreate the disasters of the Whitlam government in a few short years.
Anyway it is about time that the FT acknowledged what has been plain for quite a while: Stagflation is about to arrive.
March 26, 2012 at 12:13 am |
Peters Chemical Company is one of the leading suppliers of industrial and chemical lime (calcium oxide and calcium hydroxide and lime kiln dust) and agicultural limestone (PCC Agricultural Limesstone) in the Northeast. We carry a full line of ice mel…
[...]Stagflation rears its ugly head « Charles Rowley's Blog[...]…