June 10, 2009: Barack Obama Loots Chrysler Bondholders


“June 10 will be a silent anniversary, but one worth noting by those alarmed at the past year’s assault on free institutions.  It was last June 10 when the federal government tossed aside the option of proven workable bankrupcty procedures in order to nationalize Chrysler on behalf of its union allies.” Mitch Daniels, ‘Hoosiers vs. Crony Capitalism’ The Wall Street Journal, June 4, 2010

The Chrysler intervention by Barack Obama breached the rule of law and categorized his administration as yet another Third World despotism that despises the rule of law and forces discriminatory practices down the throat of a weak and cowardly judiciary. It provides an almost perfect example of state (crony) capitalism at its worst in the hands of an unscrupulous would-be tyrant.

Well-established bankruptcy laws in the United States provide for a clearly articulated preference in favor of secured over unsecured creditors. Chrysler’s secured bondholders had confidently anticipated that their prior status would protect them from the worst implications of the impending bankruptcy of the Chrysler Corporation. Obama and his UAW cronies moved to cut off these law-abiding bondholders at the pass and shake them down for as much as they could carry away.

Naturally, the secured bondholders started out by defending their legal rights. Obama’s apparatchiks  (notably Lawrence Summers and Timothy Geithner)  attacked them mercilessly, warning of the serious consequences that would surely  follow from their continued resistance. Large numbers of secured bondholders chose safety over liberty and acquiesced to federal pressure.

A number of brave souls, however, refused to buckle. The one legal effort to block the Obama cramdown was launched by three Indiana pension funds that had invested in Chrysler bonds in part as a supportive gesture for a longtime state employer. Predictably, they were swept aside by the would-be tyrant in the White House.

The bankruptcy came in a new illegal form run by a corrupt federal government. The United Auto Workers Group, who owned no interest whatsoever in Chrysler, was gifted a 55 per cent interest valued at $4.5 billion. This gift was all the more remarkable because the UAW had been largely responsible for bankrupting the corporation in the first place.  When no company came forward to purchase the corporation, after a minute passage of time, the Obama administration gave a 20 per cent interest away for free to Fiat, a third-rate Italian auto producer. It then took a sizeable slice of the corporation for itself,  before tossing the remnants back to the secured bondholders.

For Indiana’s retired teachers and state policemen, the remnants amounted to 29 cents on the dollar, a loss of $6 million versus the purchase price and millions more below the expected payout from a standard Chapter 11 bankrupcty proceeding. When the Hoosiers appealed the verdict, they confronted the full reality of cowardice from the appellate court.

The Second District U.S. Court of Appeals – where the appeal was heard – is a progressive socialist outpost that retains little respect for the rule of law.  Predictably, that Court declined to overturn the cramdown, though its judges, no doubt for shame, refused to explicate precedential reasons for this decision. The Supreme Court of the United States, to which the Hoosiers made their final appeal, has no Horseman of the Apocalypse on its benches. In a singular act of  craven cowardice, the Justice Roberts Court refused to hear the appeal.

The Hoosiers refused to cave, even in the face of  this almighty rebuff. Aided by pro-bono counsel, they returned yet again to the Supreme Court. This time, the Court, now  less in awe of the would-be tyrant, granted certiorari.  The Court ruled from the bench to strike down the decision of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, thus removing that decision as a potential precedent for bankrupcty proceedings.

As Mitch Daniels, Governor of the State of Indiana,  notes in his column, ‘Our retirees are still out the $6 million but enjoyed the small vindication of being awarded the court clerk’s costs at Chrysler’s expense.’

I doubt that you read about that December 14, 2009 court decision in any of the left-leaning media newspapers. For it is a sharp slap in the face for a would-be tyrant, on whose Third World coat-tails most of the media are riding as long as they possibly can.

Tags: , , , ,

13 Responses to “June 10, 2009: Barack Obama Loots Chrysler Bondholders”

  1. Black Flag Says:

    The slap in the face would have been to undo the verdict completely.

    This was merely a way to agree with the outcome while shutting up the victim by bathing him is some insignificant degree of vindication.

  2. von Pepe Says:

    I work at one of the largest distressed hedge funds.

    On Friday, we were sitting around discussing BP and “would you buy BP stock?” (9% dividend yield now). Now, I do not know if it is true, but we had all heard that there is a government imposed liability of $75 million per environmental incident – lets stipulate that this limit exits.

    To-a-person, in the room, the two responses were:

    1. The governemnt will ignore the liability cap (which was probably a big reason BP was willing to drill in risky deep water) and bankrupt BP
    2. The government will seize BP
    The point is not whether we were correct since it was a lunchtime chat, but the fact that insted of talking valuation which is what we usually do we were only talking about government thuggery.
    Lastly, if the liability cap exists, I can guarantee that the most vociferous proponents of its original passage included the senators and congressmen from Louisiana.

  3. charlesrowley Says:

    von Pepe:

    You comment is spot on. That unfortunately is what happens when a government breaches the rule of law and gets away with it. Trust disappears and a lot of valuable ventures never occur. What does not happen goes unseen and unremarked upon. And a great nation slides into Second World status.

    Thank you for your thoughts. I am sure readers will learn from them.

  4. SHOULD WE WISH OBAMA TO SUCCEED? « Random Thots Says:

    [...] http://charlesrowley.wordpress.com/2010/06/04/june-10-2009-barack-obama-loots-chrysler-bondholders/ [...]

  5. Obama’s Corrupt Bailout Promotes Democratic Detroit During the Super Bowl | Floyd Reports Says:

    [...] by Barack Obama, who needed Chrysler’s case to end “well” for the United Auto Workers (UAW) regardless of who had to be screwed. Gerber got the job [...]

  6. What does Charles Krauthammer Have in Common With Neville Chamberlain? Objectivity? | Pitts Report Says:

    [...] police rampant voter fraud, the takeover of much of the auto industry and banking sector, the gross violation of investment protocol in the Chrysler affair at the expense of legally secured bondholders, the [...]

  7. Scaramoocher | Be Sure You're RIGHT, Then Go Ahead Says:

    [...] police rampant voter fraud, the takeover of much of the auto industry and banking sector, the gross violation of investment protocol in the Chrysler affair at the expense of legally secured bondholders, the [...]

  8. A Lawless White House Says:

    [...] http://americansforprosperity.org/obamachart.php http://charlesrowley.wordpress.com/2010/06/04/june-10-2009-barack-obama-loots-chrysler-bondholders/ http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124105303238271343.html AKPC_IDS += "3504,";Popularity: 1% [...]

  9. ¿Cuál es tu plan para el día después de mañana? - Mises Daily en español Says:

    [...] Rowley, C. (2009, 10 de junio). “June 10, 2009: Barack Obama Loots Chrysler Bondholders”, Charles Rowley's [...]

  10. autopark-s Says:

    Предоставляем поддержку при оформлении автомобилей для предприятий и физических лиц в ГАИ и МРЭО. Спектр наших услуг включает: постановка на учет любых транспортных средств, снятие с учета транспортных средств, получение кода автохозяйства, прохождение государственного технического осмотра, получение красивых автономеров , юридическая помощь в замене технических паспортов, организация выписки справки-счет, консультации по вопросам приобретения в кредит, справка по выезду транспорта за рубеж . Юридическая служба `Автопарк-сервиса` имеет большой опыт работы с транспортными средствами и внимательно следит за всеми изменениями, происходящими в законодательном поле. Приглашаем к сотрудничеству страховых агентов и лизинговые компании. снять авто с учета

  11. “A Nation of Laws, or One Man?” « Stuff My Sisters Will Like Says:

    [...] Ignoring Chrysler bond holders’ rights to benefit the UAW Union. [...]

  12. A LOOK BACK AT OBAMA’S FIRST 18 MONTHS | RANDOM THOTS Says:

    [...] http://charlesrowley.wordpress.com/2010/06/04/june-10-2009-barack-obama-loots-chrysler-bondholders/ [...]

  13. The Case Against Barack Obama – Part II — 5 November 2012 | thefundamentalthingsapply Says:

    [...]  In the auto bailout of 2009, Obama ran roughshod over the clear legal rights of secured bondholders, who had first priority for payments. [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 77 other followers

%d bloggers like this: