The Curious Case of Arlen Specter and Joe Sestak


Senator Arlen Specter (D.PA)  is the kind of politician who makes one’s flesh crawl, whatever one’s particular political philosophy. There are several reasons for this reaction. First, Specter is one of those old, decrepit, chronically sick, octogenarian politicians who cling onto office as best they can until the Grim Reaper  finally drags them off the stage.  Second, he is a man without any principles to guide him save the basic instinct to cling onto office, by taking any political position expedient to that goal. Third, he is a man without any loyalty to colleagues and friends, ever-ready to exploit them for political gain, to abandon them whenever the grass momentarily is greener.  In short, the man is an utter cad, who quit the Republican Party on April 28, 2009 simply because he could not stomach a tough Republican primary challenge in 2010

Joe Sespak, by comparison, is something of an American hero. Graduating second in his class at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Sestak rose to the rank of three-star admiral.  He served as director for defense policy on the National Security Council during the presidency of Bill Clinton, and, after 9/11, he served as the first director of  ‘Deep Blue’, the Navy’s anti-terrorism unit.  Elected to the House as a Democrat  in 2006  to represent Pennyslvania’s 7th district, Sestak easily retained his seat in the 2008 elections.

Since President Obama’s election to the presidency, Sestak has been one of his most loyal supporters. He supported the February 2009 economic stimulus legislation, he supported Obama’s decision to close Guantanamo Bay prison for suspected terrorists. He voted for Obama’s health care reform legislation, and he strongly supports the Employee Free Choice Act.  What more, one might one ask, could Obama want from this virtual policy clone?

Well, plenty actually. President Obama definitely did not want Representative Sestak to pursue a bid to join the United States Senate, since such a bid might displace the re-election expectations of his beloved Arlen Specter, the turncoat who had helped to deliver the 60th vote to the Democrats  (if only for a brief moment) in the U.S. Senate.

Allegedly, in the summer of 2009, the White House attempted to interfere with the primary election – a felony if the allegation turns out to be correct – by offering Representative Sestak a high-ranking federal job, should he drop out of the race in favor of Arlen Specter.  In February 2010, Sestak, then trailing Specter in the polls, disclosed this intervention to a Philadelphia-based cable host. In the event, Sestak refused the offer and wiped Specter off the political map in the May 2010 Pennsylvania primary.

Now that Sestak is the official Democratic candidate running against a strong Republican competitor, one can imagine that both the President and Joe Sestak wish that the issue would disappear. That is unlikely to happen in the partisan atmosphere of Washington, D.C. in the middle of  an important mid-term election.

No doubt the White House will be able, with increasing memory loss on the part of Sestak, to avoid the felony charge. But the thought that remains in my mind is why ever a United States President would try to support a disloyal low-life like Arlen Specter against an American hero like Joe Sestak, who shares  his every dream and has never displayed disloyalty to any of his colleagues.

“Curiouser and curiouser”,  said Alice.

Tags: , , , ,

5 Responses to “The Curious Case of Arlen Specter and Joe Sestak”

  1. trent steele Says:

    Is it possible that Obama preferred Specter because Specter would have seniority and therefore better position on committees?

  2. Black Flag Says:

    Prof. Rowley,

    I expect my surprise at the revelation is not well founded. It was rhetorical from the start.

    The power of violence knows no friends but violence.

    Its enemies are all those that refuse violence, therefore refuse its power.

    Specter has comes to grip with this truth a half-century ago. You are an enemy of violence or a supporter. It is -truly- a dichotomy. He made his choice. Humanities only hope for such creatures as he is that there really exists an after-life and that there is a hell for such souls.

  3. charlesrowley Says:

    Trent:

    I am not certain about this but I believe that Specter was denied seniority on Senate committees following his switch of parties. If so, that would not explain Obama’s behavior.

    Black Flag:

    I have a lot of sympathy for your position on this.

  4. Classie Trett Says:

    Exxxcelent!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 68 other followers

%d bloggers like this: